The impact of ocean acidification on species in different parts of the world has been miscalculated, so far, and its impact in some cases over- and in other cases underestimated, an analysis of 86 research papers by experts from around the world has revealed. Many of these earlier studies had not taken into account natural variation in baseline acidity levels across the world’s seas, leading to incorrect assumptions.
As the ocean absorbs some of the surplus carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it gradually becomes more acidic, meaning that pH is decreasing, and animals need to cope with their changing environment. While studying the effect of ocean acidification, scientists have revealed varying responses among the same species. For example, with copepods, which are small crustaceans at the base of the food chain, two populations of the same species were shown to have contrasting responses to the same level of acidification: one being very sensitive and negatively impacted in terms of growth and survival, while the other showed a positive response.
Here is why.
The same species of an organism may exist all over the world – like us, humans – but because of contrasting environments, species evolve to thrive and survive in their given habitat. In the field of ocean acidification, this environmental variation adds another layer of detail to consider in research. “If you use for an experiment, for example, two populations of the same species but from different regions and you ignore the environmental variation in which they live, you may produce different results. What is a stress for one, may be natural for the other,” said Sam Dupont, Senior Lecturer at the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, and a consultant with the IAEA Radioecology Laboratory in Monaco, which hosts the Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre (OA-ICC). “There is a lot of conflicting data in ocean acidification studies because something was overlooked – it’s the fact that pH variability is different everywhere.”